WEDEMEYER v. NIKE IHM, INC.

A157008.

513 P.3d 610 (2022)

319 Or. App. 781

Michele R. WEDEMEYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIKE IHM, INC., a Missouri corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

May 25, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Rose , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Kevin H. Kono , Portland, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the briefs were Christie S. Totten and Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.

Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Kamins, Judge, and DeVore, Senior Judge.


Plaintiff worked as a production manager for defendant Nike for eight years until their relationship deteriorated, leading to this lawsuit. Plaintiff alleges that she faced multiple forms of employment discrimination during her time at Nike. Some of those claims were rejected on summary judgment and the last by directed verdict. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases