JAMES, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for various crimes, arguing that the record does not reflect a knowing and intelligent waiver of her right to counsel, because the trial court did not engage in a colloquy, on the record, nor is the record otherwise sufficient to satisfy the requirements of State v. Meyrick,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.