C. L. C. v. CORDELL

A175323.

508 P.3d 73 (2022)

318 Or. App. 654

C. L. C., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Brandon K. CORDELL, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

March 30, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brandon Cordell filed the brief pro se.

Ted A. Martin filed the brief for respondent.

Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.


Respondent appeals the judgment concerning a stalking protective order (SPO) under ORS 30.866(1), arguing that the evidence does not support the trial court's findings and that the court's conclusion that the requirements for the issuance of an SPO were met was legal error.1 We find respondent's arguments unavailing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases