PER CURIAM.
Respondent appeals the judgment concerning a stalking protective order (SPO) under ORS 30.866(1), arguing that the evidence does not support the trial court's findings and that the court's conclusion that the requirements for the issuance of an SPO were met was legal error.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.