ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent on Review,
v.
Douglas Dean FASCHING, Petitioner on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and submitted May 6, 2021.
February 10, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jonathan M. Radmacher , McEwen Gisvold LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.
Kelly F. Huedepohl , Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.
Nadia H. Dahab , Sugerman Law Office, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. Also on the brief was Phil Goldsmith , Law Office of Phil Goldsmith, Portland.
Before Walters, Chief Justice, and Balmer, Flynn, Duncan, Nelson, and Garrett, Justices, and Nakamoto, Senior Judge, Justice pro tempore.
DUNCAN, J.
This case concerns Oregon Evidence Code (OEC) 803(6), the "business records" exception to the hearsay rule.1 In the trial court, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, each of which focused on whether documents plaintiff had received from a third party were admissible. Plaintiff argued that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.