WESTHAVEN, LLC v. CITY OF DAYTON

A170224.

504 P.3d 1279 (2021)

316 Or. App. 641

WESTHAVEN, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTON, acting THROUGH its MUNICIPAL COURT and Judge Mahr, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and submitted September 2, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Kelly , Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Christopher D. Crean , Portland, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Heather R. Martin and Beery, Elsner & Hammond, LLP.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge.


In this appeal from a circuit court judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of review, we must first determine whether we have appellate jurisdiction to address a challenge to a violation of a municipal ordinance. We conclude, as explained below, that we do not have jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Westhaven...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases