STATE v. KADIN

A173155.

501 P.3d 1144 (2021)

316 Or. App. 100

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Erik Daniel KADIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 1, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary J. Stern , Salem, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the opening brief was Ferder Casebeer French & Stern, LLP. Also on the reply brief was Ferder Casebeer French & Thompson, LLP.

Carson L. Whitehead , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.


Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for four sex offenses, raising five assignments of error. We affirm.

In the first, second, and fourth assignments of error, defendant asserts that the trial court plainly erred by not, on its own initiative, striking testimony that, in defendant's view, constituted impermissible vouching testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases