Nancy HERSEY and Julie Budeau, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Christine LEON; Adam Doern and Kathryn Doern, husband and wife; Jeffrey Shivers; Cindy Shivers; Sandra Eymer; Michael Dewitz; Michael Stefan Leoniak; Jeffrey Ommert and Christine Ommert, husband and wife; Kenneth Borslien and Elizabeth Borslien, husband and wife; Edward Jahn and Devon Jahn, husband and wife; Kyle Kraxberger and Fallon Kraxberger, Successors-in-Interest to PPI Consulting, LLC; Abigail Smith; Todd Loewy and Leah Loewy, husband and wife; Jim Samuels; Molly Little; Charles Hinkle; Brock Inman and Amy Gillcrist, husband and wife; Earl Shay and Kathleen Shay, husband and wife; Robert Weaver and Jean Horn, husband and wife; Bank of America, N.A.; Ditech Financial, LLC; and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and
Keith Kutler, et al., Defendants.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and submitted July 22, 2020.
September 1, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Gary M. Bullock , Portland, argued the cause for appellants. Also on the briefs was Gary M. Bullock and Associates, P.C.
Charles F. Hinkle , Portland, argued the cause for respondents Christine Leon, Adam Doern, Kathryn Doern, Jeffrey Shivers, Cindy Shivers, Sandra Eymer, Michael Dewitz, Michael Stefan Leoniak, Jeffrey Ommert, Christine Ommert, Kenneth Borslien, Elizabeth Borslien, Edward Jahn, Devon Jahn, Kyle Kraxberger, Fallon Kraxberger, Abigail Smith, Todd Loewy, Leah Loewy, Jim Samuels, Molly Little, Brock Inman, Amy Gillcrist, Charles Hinkle, Earl Shay, Kathleen Shay, Robert Weaver, and Jean Horn. Also on the brief was Stoel Rives LLP.
Katie Jo Johnson filed the brief for respondent Bank of America N.A. Also on the brief was McEwen Gisvold LLP.
William G. Fig filed the brief for respondent Ditech Financial LLC. Also on the brief was Sussman Shank LLP.
John M. Thomas filed the brief for respondent Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. Also on the brief was McCarthy & Holthus, LLP.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff1 appeals from a judgment dismissing her claims for adverse possession and quiet title and declaring that the easement she sought to adversely possess, and quiet title to, remained in full force and effect. The judgment also declares, based on defendants' counterclaims, that the easement constituted a covenant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
