1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 498 P.3d
  5. 498 P.3d 1 (2021)
 

LEMUS v. POTTER

A167142.

498 P.3d 1 (2021)

314 Or. App. 201

Maria LEMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary POTTER, aka Matthew Donald Potter, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 1, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ron K. Cheng argued the cause for appellant. Also on the opening brief was Pickett Dummigan McCall LLP. Also on the combined reply and answering brief were R. Brendan Dummigan and Pickett Dummigan McCall LLP.

Tyler E. Staggs , Salem, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the answering brief were David E. Smith and Spooner & Much, PC. Also on the reply brief was Spooner & Much, PC.

Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Kamins, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff brought this negligence action against Gary Potter to recover damages resulting from an automobile accident. Before trial, plaintiff moved to amend her complaint to substitute Gary's son, Matthew Donald Potter, for Gary. The trial court denied that motion primarily because plaintiff's claim against Matthew would not relate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases