1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 496 P.3d
  5. 496 P.3d 688 (2021)
 

CRIM. JUSTICE REFORM v. BOARD OF PAROLE

A172093.

496 P.3d 688 (2021)

313 Or. App. 592

CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM CLINIC AT LEWIS & CLARK LAW SCHOOL, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

July 28, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mieke de Vrind argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the briefs were Aliza B. Kaplan and Criminal Justice Reform Clinic, Lewis & Clark Law School.

Paul L. Smith , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 255-032-0005(4) and (5) (the JAM-II rules), two rules of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) which relate to parole consideration for juveniles convicted of aggravated murder between 1989 and 1995. Petitioner contends that the rules violate the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases