1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 492 P.3d
  5. 492 P.3d 642 (2021)
 

ALLIED STRUCTURAL v. CONST. CONTRACTORS

A164317.

492 P.3d 642 (2021)

311 Or. App. 40

ALLIED STRUCTURAL, Petitioner, v. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Resubmitted en banc December 16, 2020.

May 5, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher W. Peterman , Roseburg, argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the opening brief were Keith D. Ropp and Christopher W. Peterman , Attorney at Law, P.C., Also on the reply brief was Christopher W. Peterman , Attorney at Law, P.C.

Denise G. Fjordbeck , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Egan, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Ortega, DeVore, Lagesen, Tookey, DeHoog, Shorr, James, Aoyagi, Powers, Mooney, and Kamins, Judges.

Does the Construction Contractors Board (CCB) have the statutory authority to impose a monetary penalty when it determines that a license applicant or licensee is unfit for licensure based on one of the criminal convictions listed in ORS 701.098(1)(i)? We took this matter into full court to consider that question because it is an important...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases