KING v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON

A167392.

482 P.3d 110 (2021)

308 Or. App. 716

Robert Haden KING, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

January 27, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc D. Brown , Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet , Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jeff J. Payne , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and James, Judge.


Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision from a murder-review hearing, in which the board upheld its previous order after a remand from this court. Petitioner argues that the board's order lacks substantial reason. We affirm.

In King v. Board of Parole,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases