MCNICHOLS v. DEPT. OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

A172135.

482 P.3d 208 (2021)

308 Or. App. 369

Michael MCNICHOLS, an individual, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, an agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent-Respondent, and Curt Melcher, in his capacity as the Director of that same agency, Respondent below, and Canby Development, LLC, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

January 6, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael McNichols argued the cause and filed the briefs pro se.

Philip Thoennes , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Fish and Wildlife. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

David A. Anderson , Jessica A. Schuh , and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, PC, filed the brief for respondent Canby Development, LLC.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.


This is an appeal in a combined proceeding under the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA), ORS 183.310 to 183.745, and the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, ORS 28.010 to 28.160. In it, plaintiff/petitioner1 McNichols seeks to challenge a settlement agreement between the Oregon Department of Fish...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases