KLEIKAMP v. BD. OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTY

A164255.

455 P.3d 546 (2019)

301 Or. App. 275

T. J. KLEIKAMP, individually and Friends of Yamhill County, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiffs-Respondents Cross-Respondents, and State of Oregon, by and through the Department of Land Conservation and Development, Intervenor-Respondent Cross-Respondent, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, an Oregon municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent, and Steven Gregg and Thomas Gregg, Defendants Cross-Appellants, and Donald Greggssi, an individual, Intervenor-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 11, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy S. Sadlo , Portland, and T. Beau Ellis , argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents Donald Gregg, and Board of Commissioners of Yamhill County. Also on the joint briefs was Vial Fotheringham LLP.

Edward H. Trompke , Lake Oswego, argued the cause for cross-appellants Steven Gregg and Thomas Gregg. Also on the briefs was Jordan Ramis PC.

Ralph O. Bloemers , argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-cross-respondents T. J. Kleikamp , and Friends of Yamhill County.

Frederick M. Boss , Deputy Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas , Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent-cross-respondent State of Oregon.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Chief Judge, and Powers, Judge.


Steven, Thomas, and Donald Gregg and the Board of Commissioners of Yamhill County appeal from a judgment entered in a writ of review proceeding that reversed Yamhill County's determination that, under Yamhill County Ordinance 823 and section 5(3) of Ballot Measure 49 (2007), Steven, Thomas, and Donald Gregg have a right to complete a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases