BROWN v. PARKS AND RECREATION

A165691.

443 P.3d 1170 (2019)

296 Or.App. 886

Tom BROWN, Petitioner, v. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, BY AND THROUGH STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

April 3, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan R. Morales argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the opening brief were Perkins Coie LLP and James E. Mountain, Jr. , and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C. On the reply brief were Nathan R. Morales , Laura F. Segal , and Perkins Coie LLP, and James E. Mountain, Jr. , and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.

Jona J. Maukonen , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before DeHoog, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Brewer, Senior Judge.


In this rule challenge under ORS 183.400(1),1 petitioner contends that information published online by the Oregon. Parks and Recreation Department, through its State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), describing property owners eligible to concur in or object to a nomination of property for inclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases