STATE v. TAYLOR

A164186.

433 P.3d 486 (2018)

295 Or.App. 32

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathan Richard TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

November 21, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rond Chananudech , Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs was Ernest G. Lannet , Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, Office of Public Defense Services.

Jacob Brown , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.


Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation and imposing a period of 36 months' incarceration as a revocation sanction. The parties agree that under OAR 213-010-0002(2), when a sentencing court revokes a departure term of probation, the maximum revocation sanction is the defendant's presumptive maximum. Defendant was categorized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases