FREDRICKSON v. STARBUCKS CORP.

(CC 121215734) (SC S065165).

429 P.3d 727 (2018)

363 Or. 810

Hannah FREDRICKSON, Ashley Krening, and Maurialee Bracke, Plaintiffs-Adverse Parties, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant-Relator.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

November 8, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pratik A. Shah , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington D.C., argued the cause for relator. Christopher R. McCracken , David Wright Tremaine LLP, Portland, filed the briefs. Also on the briefs were Daniel L. Nash , Pratik A. Shah , and James E. Tysse , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington D.C., and Gregory W. Knopp , Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, California.

Jon M. Egan , Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for adverse parties.


This original mandamus proceeding arises out of an underlying wage-and-hour action. Plaintiffs in that action are former Starbucks baristas. They sued Starbucks, claiming that it improperly calculated state and federal tax withholdings and, as a result, improperly deducted those withholdings from plaintiffs' paychecks. Plaintiffs alleged that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases