SPURGER v. SAIF CORP.

A160697.

423 P.3d 121 (2018)

292 Or. App. 227

In the Matter of the Compensation of Angelica M. Spurger, Claimant, Angelica M. SPURGER, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Pacific Health and Rehabilitation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

June 6, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Hooten argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

David L. Runner , Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before DeHoog, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.


In this workers' compensation case, claimant challenges the Workers' Compensation Board's determination that she is not entitled to an award of five percent impairment for a chronic and permanent medical condition, as defined in OAR 436-035-0019(1)(i). This is the second time that we have considered a board order rejecting claimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases