BORA ARCHITECTS, INC. v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY

A166548.

422 P.3d 412 (2018)

291 Or. App. 537

BORA ARCHITECTS, INC., Respondent, v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY, Respondent below, and Seabreeze Associates Limited Partnership, Petitioner. Charles and Elizabeth Allgood, Respondents, v. Tillamook County, Respondent below, and Seabreeze Associates Limited Partnership, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

May 2, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott G. Seidman , Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Megan K. Houlihan and Tonkon Torp LLP.

William K. Kabeiseman argued the cause for respondent Bora Architects, Inc. With him on the brief was Bateman Seidel Miner , Blomgren Chellis & Gram, P.C.

Zack P. Mittge , Eugene, argued the cause for respondents Charles and Elizabeth Allgood. With him on the brief was Hutchinson Cox.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.


In this land use case, petitioner Seabreeze Associates Limited Partnership seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order that reversed Tillamook County's decision to approve Seabreeze's application for preliminary subdivision plat approval for its property. LUBA determined that Seabreeze's application was void under ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases