CARRILLO v. SAIF CORP.

A160030.

420 P.3d 636 (2018)

291 Or.App. 589

In the Matter of the Compensation of Mario Carrillo, Claimant. Mario CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

May 2, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur W. Stevens, III , Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert L. Chapman and Black, Chapman, Webber & Stevens, Medford.

David L. Runner , Salem, argued the cause and file the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.


In this workers' compensation case, claimant contends that the board erred in treating his left shoulder condition as a "combined condition" under ORS 656.005 (7)(a)(B) and in determining that it was not compensable because SAIF had met its burden to show that the "otherwise compensable injury" was not the major contributing cause of the combined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases