OSSANNA v. NIKE, INC.

A157434.

415 P.3d 55 (2018)

290 Or.App. 16

Douglas OSSANNA, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant-Respondent,

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

January 31, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Estok argued the cause for appellant. With him on the opening brief were Glen McClendon and Lindsay Hart, LLP. With them on the reply brief was Alice Newlin.

Brenda K. Baumgart , Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Amy Joseph Pedersen , Laura E. Rosenbaum , and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before DeHoog, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Edmonds, Senior Judge.


Plaintiff is a licensed electrician who previously worked for defendant, Nike, Inc., in its maintenance department. Defendant fired plaintiff after he used one of defendant's on-site basketball courts at a prohibited time. In response, plaintiff sued defendant for, among other things, statutory safety complaint and whistleblower retaliation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases