STATE v. SIPPEL

A161780.

406 P.3d 207 (2017)

288 Or. App. 391

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Erik Johann SIPPEL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

October 25, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest G. Lannet , Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah Laidlaw , Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman , Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah , Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.


Defendant was convicted of interfering with a peace officer for refusing to obey a lawful order, ORS 162.247 (1)(b). On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing the state, during rebuttal closing argument, to introduce a new theory as to which lawful order he had disobeyed. According to defendant, the introduction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases