MAIDENS v. NOOTH

A158597.

403 P.3d 797 (2017)

288 Or. App. 37

Randy Lee MAIDENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 27, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jed Peterson , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O'Connor Weber LLP.

Dustin Buehler , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and James, Judge.


Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his successive petition for post-conviction relief. He acknowledges that his petition was untimely, but contends that it should have been allowed under the so-called "escape clauses" of ORS 138.510(3) and ORS 138.550(3) because he did not learn of the facts underlying his claims for relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases