MIGIS v. AUTOZONE, INC.

A150540.

396 P.3d 309 (2017)

286 Or. App. 357

Michael MIGIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

June 21, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy Pulvers , Portland, and Holland & Knight LLP for petition.

A.E. Bud Bailey , J. Dana Pinney , and Bailey, Pinney & Associates, LLC, for response.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.


Defendant, Autozone, Inc., petitions for reconsideration of our decision, Migis v. Autozone, Inc., 282 Or.App. 774, 387 P.3d 381 (2016), concerning the disposition of its appeal. Defendant argues that concepts of waiver or invited error should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases