1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 392 P.3d
  5. 392 P.3d 781 (2017)
 

ROBINSON v. DEFAZIO

A156582.

392 P.3d 781 (2017)

284 Or. App. 98

Art ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. Peter DEFAZIO, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent, and John Does 1, 2, and 3; and DeFazio for Congress Committee, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

March 1, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda K. Williams , Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With her on the briefs was Daniel W. Meek.

James L. Buchal , Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Murphy & Buchal LLP.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.

Defendant Peter DeFazio appeals from a supplemental judgment that awarded him some, but not all, of his attorney fees and costs against plaintiff Art Robinson. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by applying unlawful and impermissible factors when it reduced defendant's attorney fee request.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases