1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 388 P.3d
  5. 388 P.3d 434 (2016)
 

LAND WATCH OF LANE COUNTY v. LANE COUNTY

A162909.

388 P.3d 434 (2016)

283 Or. App. 217

LAND WATCH OF LANE COUNTY and Lee D. Kersten, Respondents Cross-Petitioners, v. LANE COUNTY, Respondent below, and CITY OF COBURG and Interstate Properties, Inc., Petitioners Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo Mecham argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the joint briefs were Daniel Terrell and Law Offices of Bill Kloos PC.

William K. Kabeiseman , Portland, argued the cause for respondents-cross petitioners. With him on the brief were Carrie A. Richter and Bateman Seidel Miner Blomgren Chellis & Gram, P.C.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

This case involves review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). In 2015, following urbanization studies and public hearings, the City of Coburg and Lane County coadopted two ordinances to amend the city's urban growth boundary (UGB) and to revise the city's transportation system plan. Respondents, Land Watch and Kersten...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases