1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 388 P.3d
  5. 388 P.3d 1121 (2016)
 

STATE v. DICKAS

A156174.

388 P.3d 1121 (2016)

283 Or. App. 59

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William David DICKAS, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 21, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Dickas, Portland, argued the cause pro se. On the briefs were Thomas R. Rask, III , and Kell, Alterman & Runstein, LLP.

Jennifer S. Lloyd , Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General, and Peenesh H. Shah , Assistant Attorney General.

Before Sercombe, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Chief Judge, and Tookey, Judge.

This is a traffic violation case in which defendant was found guilty of violating the posted speed limit, ORS 811.111. The charge was made in a traffic citation based on a photo-radar operation in a highway work zone in the City of Portland. See ORS 810.441; ORS 810.442.1 On appeal, defendant asserts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases