1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 387 P.3d
  5. 387 P.3d 381 (2016)
 

MIGIS v. AUTOZONE, INC.

A150540.

387 P.3d 381 (2016)

282 Or.App. 774

Michael MIGIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

December 14, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy Pulvers , Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the opening brief was Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP. With him on the combined reply and answering brief on cross-appeal and the reply brief on cross-assignment of error was Holland & Knight LLP.

A E Bud Bailey , argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. On the briefs were J. Dana Pinneym , and Bailey, Pinney & Associates, LLC.

Mark A. Friel , and Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter PC, filed the brief amicus curiae for Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

Plaintiff Migis filed a class action against his former employer, defendant AutoZone, Inc., on behalf of himself and current and former employees of defendant. He alleged several wage-violation claims, seeking damages and statutory penalties. After a jury trial and bench trial, defendant appeals a general judgment that awarded plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases