1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 380 P.3d
  5. 380 P.3d 1048 (2016)
 

HESSEL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

A148471.

380 P.3d 1048 (2016)

280 Or. App. 16

Brian HESSEL and Arlen Porter Smith, Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

August 3, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison Latto , Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Jona J. Maukonen , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.

In this rule challenge under ORS 183.400, petitioners, inmates at a Department of Corrections facility, seek review of three rules promulgated by the department: OAR 291-105-0005(3)(d), OAR 291-105-0010(29), and OAR 291-105-0015(4)(n).1 Specifically, petitioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases