1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 372 P.3d
  5. 372 P.3d 517 (2016)
 

UTILITY REFORM PROJECT v. OREGON PUC

UM1402; A150814.

372 P.3d 517 (2016)

277 Or. App. 325

UTILITY REFORM PROJECT, Petitioner, v. OREGON PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and Portland General Electric Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 6, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Michael Casper , Deputy Solicitor General, argued the cause for respondent Oregon Public Utility Commission. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck , Assistant Attorney General.

James N. Westwood argued the cause for respondent Portland General Electric Company. With him on the brief was Stoel Rives LLP.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and DeVORE, Judge, and GARRETT, Judge.

In another installment of a long-running dispute related to the closure of the Trojan nuclear power plant, petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that granted respondent Portland General Electric's (PGE) request to amortize in its rates certain costs of issuing a refund to ratepayers.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases