COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER v. CLATSOP COUNTY

2010109 and 201310; A157374 (Control) and A157375.

341 P.3d 790 (2014)

267 Or. App. 578

COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and NW Property Rights Coalition, Respondents, v. CLATSOP COUNTY, Respondent, and Oregon Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner. Oregon Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner Cross-Respondent, v. Clatsop County, Respondent Cross-Petitioner, and Columbia Riverkeeper and NW Property Rights Coalition, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 17, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Michael Connors argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Hathaway Koback Connors LLP.

Jeff Bennet argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Timothy V. Ramis and Jordan Ramis PC.

Lauren R. Goldberg and Brett Vanden-Heuvel filed the brief for respondents.

Before DeVORE, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON, Chief Judge, and GARRETT, Judge.


Oregon Pipeline Company, LLC (OPC) petitions for review of two decisions of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that relate to OPC's application for land-use approvals from Clatsop County for a 41-mile segment of a natural gas pipeline. In November 2010, the Clatsop County Board of Commissioners (the board)1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases