PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for violating a court's stalking protective order. ORS 163.750. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting the stalking protective order and the victim's petition for the stalking protective order, both of which, in defendant's view, should have been excluded under OEC 403.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.