1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 340 P.3d
  5. 340 P.3d 737 (2014)
 

W.M. v. MUCK

CV110221; A149862.

340 P.3d 737 (2014)

267 Or. App. 368

W.M., guardian ad litem, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Charles MUCK, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 3, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brent J. Goodfellow and Johnstone & Goodfellow filed the brief for appellant.

Vincent A. Deguc filed the brief for respondent.

Before DUNCAN, Presiding Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge, and LAGESEN, Judge.

Respondent appeals a judgment that imposed a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) against him, contending that the evidence was insufficient and that the trial court therefore erred in imposing it. We agree with respondent and reverse.

Respondent requests that we review the record de novo. See ORS 19.415(3) (the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases