PATTON v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS. CO.

031112054; A150143.

337 P.3d 874 (2014)

266 Or. App. 154

Lowell E. PATTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and Hopp Insurance Agency, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and Randy W. Hopp, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 8, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen C. Tompkins , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Robert K. Udziela.

Thomas M. Christ , Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge, and EGAN, Judge.


NAKAMOTO, J.

This insurance coverage case comes before us a second time. In the first appeal, Patton v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co., 238 Or.App. 101, 242 P.3d 624 (2010), rev. den., 349 Or. 654, 249 P.3d 542 (2011) (Patton I), this court reversed a judgment for plaintiff on his breach of contract claim on a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases