1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 333 P.3d
  5. 333 P.3d 1089 (2014)
 

R&R TREE AND LANDSCAPE v. DEPT. OF CONSUMER

INS1011006; A152014.

333 P.3d 1089 (2014)

264 Or. App. 568

R & R TREE AND LANDSCAPE, INC., dba R & R Tree Service, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen S. Varney , Beaverton, argued the cause for petitioner. On the opening brief were Linda C. Attridge and Radler, Bohy, Replogle & Conratt, LLP. On the reply brief was William H. Replogle.

Inge D. Wells , Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge, and TOOKEY, Judge.

TOOKEY, J.

Petitioner R & R Tree and Landscape, Inc., seeks review of a final order of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS). See ORS 183.480; ORS 183.482 (judicial review of final agency orders). The order upheld the results of premium audit billings issued by petitioner's workers' compensation insurer, SAIF Corporation (SAIF), for three audit periods: July 1, 2008 to July 1, 2009; July 1, 2009 to July 1, 2010; and July...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases