WALTERS, J.
In this criminal case, defendant was convicted of resisting arrest for violating the terms of his parole. We conclude, as did the trial court and the Court of Appeals, that an arrest for a parole violation qualifies as an arrest for purposes of ORS 162.315 — the resisting arrest statute — and affirm.
Because the jury found defendant guilty, we present the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Lewis,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.