MANUSOS v. SKEELS

062566; A151495.

330 P.3d 53 (2014)

263 Or. App. 721

Romanna MANUSOS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Francis L. SKEELS, Sr.; and Donna F. Skeels, Husband and Wife, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 25, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Cox argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Gary P. Shepherd.

Robert J. Miller, Sr. , argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Pamela Yee.

Before DUNCAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SCHUMAN, Senior Judge.


DUNCAN, P.J.

This dispute between neighbors concerns plaintiff's access to a well located on defendants' adjacent property. It is before us for the second time. In our first decision, we concluded that the trial court had erred in reforming defendants' deed to reflect a waterline easement serving plaintiff's property, because plaintiff, who was not a party to the deed or in privity with any party to the deed, was not in a position to seek its reformation. Manusos...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases