SAIF CORP. v. CARLOS-MACIAS

1004446, 1004555; A150950.

325 P.3d 827 (2014)

262 Or. App. 629

In the Matter of the Compensation of Francisco M. Carlos-Macias, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Sherman Paint & Collision, Petitioners, v. Francisco M. CARLOS-MACIAS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 7, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie Masters argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Dale C. Johnson argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.


EGAN, J.

Employer Sherman Paint & Collision, and its workers' compensation insurer SAIF Corporation (collectively, petitioners) seek judicial review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (board), which determined that there was a causal relationship between requested diagnostic medical services and claimant's accepted conditions sufficient to support the compensability of those diagnostic services under ORS 656.245(1)(a). Petitioners assert that the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases