UTILITY REFORM PROJECT v. PUBLIC UTILITY

UM1224; A143640.

323 P.3d 430 (2014)

261 Or. App. 388

UTILITY REFORM PROJECT and Ken Lewis, Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON and Portland General Electric Company, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 26, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Erin C. Lagesen , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Public Utility Commission of Oregon. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

James N. Westwood , Portland, argued the cause for respondent Portland General Electric Company. With him on the brief were Brad S. Daniels and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before WOLLHEIM, Presiding Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge, and SCHUMAN, Senior Judge.


WOLLHEIM, P.J.

Pursuant to ORS 756.610(1), petitioners Utility Reform Project and Ken Lewis (collectively referred to as URP) seek judicial review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) denying URP's request under ORS 757.259 to direct respondent Portland General Electric (PGE) to amortize certain deferred amounts into future rates. URP asserts that legislation passed in 2005 required the PUC to order PGE to refund amounts over-collected from ratepayers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases