RICE v. MARY RABB

(CC CV091445; CA A145606; SC S060790).

320 P.3d 554 (2014)

354 Or. 721

Joan RICE, Petitioner on Review, v. MARY RABB, Respondent on Review, and R-UP & Happy Canyon Hall of Fame, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided January 30, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cody Hoesly , Larkins Vacura LLP, Portland, filed the brief and argued the cause for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.

Meagan A. Flynn , Preston Bunnell & Flynn, LLP, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

Before BALMER, Chief Justice, and KISTLER, WALTERS, LINDER, LANDAU, and BALDWIN, Justices.


BALDWIN, J.

This case requires us to decide whether the six-year statute of limitations applicable to conversion and replevin claims under ORS 12.080(4) incorporates a discovery rule to determine when such claims "accrue" pursuant to ORS 12.010. The Court of Appeals concluded that the limitation prescribed by ORS 12.080(4) begins to run at the time of the wrongful taking of personal property and that the provision does not incorporate a discovery rule. Rice v....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases