CASCADE PHYSICAL THERAPY v. HARTFORD CAS.

0900090H; A148032 (Control), 0900015H; A148033, 0900016H; A148034, 0900107H; A148036, 0900009H; A148037, 0900085H; A148039.

310 P.3d 1156 (2013)

258 Or. App. 612

CASCADE PHYSICAL THERAPY, Petitioner, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. Therapeutic Associates, Inc., Petitioner, v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Specialty Risk Services, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. Chehalem Physical Therapy, Petitioner, v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Specialty Risk Services, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. Erhardt Physical Therapy, Petitioner, v. Specialty Risk Services and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. Impact Physical Therapy, Petitioner, v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Specialty Risk Services, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents. Laurelhurst Physical Therapy, Petitioner, v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Specialty Risk Services, and Department of Consumer and Business Services, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 25, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diana E. Godwin , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioners.

Stephen F. Deatherage , Portland, argued the cause for respondent Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. With him on the brief were Ronald J. Clark and Bullivant Houser Bailey PC.

Judy C. Lucas , Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Consumer and Business Services. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

Neil W. Jones waived appearance for respondent Specialty Risk Services.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and BREWER, Judge pro tempore.


ORTEGA, P.J.

This case involves a medical fee dispute in which Cascade challenges the fees paid by insurer for medical services that Cascade provided to injured workers between January 2006 and May 2008.1 Cascade seeks judicial review of a final order in which the director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) concluded, after a contested case hearing, that insurer was not required to pay Cascade any additional amounts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases