RIVER CITY INV. CO. v. NOLTING

120013500E; A151724.

308 P.3d 1079 (2013)

258 Or. App. 204

RIVER CITY INVESTMENT CO., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Julie NOLTING, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 14, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie Nolting filed the brief pro se.

No appearance for respondent.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge, and EGAN, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

In this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action involving a residential unit, defendant appeals a general judgment, entered after trial, awarding plaintiff restitution of the property.1

Defendant presents several reasons why she believes the judgment should be reversed. Under Article VII (Amended) of the Oregon Constitution, as restated in ORS 19.415, the Court of Appeals may reverse a judgment only if it affirmatively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases