HAMILTON v. SAIF CORP.

0906605; A148339.

302 P.3d 1184 (2013)

256 Or. App. 256

In the Matter of the Compensation of Pamela M. Hamilton, Claimant. Pamela M. HAMILTON, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Lane Community College-Personnel-LCC, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 17, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allison B. Lesh , Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Holly C. O'Dell argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


NAKAMOTO, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (board) that concluded that her injury, which occurred from an idiopathic1 fall from a standing position onto the brick floor of her workspace, was not compensable. On judicial review, claimant assigns error to the board's ruling that the "mixed risk" doctrine does not govern injuries sustained as a result of an idiopathic, ground-level fall and to the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases