SCHUMAN, P.J.
Defendant was convicted of murder. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in permitting two eyewitnesses to make in-court identifications. Because of "serious questions concerning the reliability of the identification evidence admitted at defendant's trial," and "[d]ue to the novelty and complexity" of newly-articulated rules and guidelines governing the admissibility of eyewitness identifications, State v. Lawson/James,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.