STATE v. HICKMAN

081235225; A144741.

298 P.3d 619 (2013)

255 Or. App. 688

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jerrin Lavazie HICKMAN, aka Jerrim Lavezie Hickman, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 20, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryan Scott argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Andrew M. Lavin , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


SCHUMAN, P.J.

Defendant was convicted of murder. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in permitting two eyewitnesses to make in-court identifications. Because of "serious questions concerning the reliability of the identification evidence admitted at defendant's trial," and "[d]ue to the novelty and complexity" of newly-articulated rules and guidelines governing the admissibility of eyewitness identifications, State v. Lawson/James,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases