PER CURIAM.
Defendant was found in contempt of court for having violated a restraining order, and the trial court then entered a judgment stating that defendant was "convicted" of violating the order. On appeal, defendant argues that the judgment erroneously reflects that he was "convicted" of an offense when, in fact, he was not. State v. Caldwell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.