IN RE PRESTON

0901227; A144676.

295 P.3d 682 (2013)

254 Or. App. 507

In the Matter of the Compensation of Terri L. Preston, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION; and DCI Holdings, Inc., Petitioners, v. Terri L. PRESTON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 9, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner , Salem, for petitioners.

Matthew L. Roy and Dunn & Roy, Salem, for respondent.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Like SAIF v. Haley, 254 Or.App. 410, ___ P.3d ___ (2012), this case is on remand from the Supreme Court. SAIF v. Preston, 352 Or. 564, 291 P.3d 736 (2012). In our earlier decision, 242 Or.App. 571, 256 P.3d 160 (2011), we held that claimant was not entitled to an insurer-paid attorney fee under ORS 656...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases