IN RE CLARK

(OSB 09-107; SC S059841).

293 P.3d 1033 (2012)

353 Or. 105

In re complaint as to the conduct of Roger Lee CLARK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 28, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Lee Clark, Eugene, pro se, filed the brief.

Stacy J. Hankin , Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Tigard, filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before BALMER, Chief Justice, and KISTLER, WALTERS, LINDER, and LANDAU, Justices.


PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the accused, Roger L. Clark, seeks review of a judgment awarding costs and disbursements to the Oregon State Bar (Bar). He does not contest the trial panel's decision on the merits of the charges that the Bar brought against him nor the sanction that the trial panel imposed.

The Bar charged the accused with three violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) and the Disciplinary Rules (DR) of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases