In the Matter of C.H., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, and
P.H., nka P.L., Respondent,
v.
T.H., Appellant.
In the Matter of L.H., a Child.
Department Of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, and
P.H., nka P.L., Respondent,
v.
T.H., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted November 2, 2012.
Decided December 27, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Holly Telerant , Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Peter Gartlan , Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services.
Inge D. Wells , Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Human Services. With her on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum , Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce , Solicitor General.
Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
SCHUMAN, P.J.
Father appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court continuing the permanency plan of APPLA, or "another planned permanent living arrangement,"1 for his two children. He argues that we must reverse and remand the judgment because the juvenile court failed to make certain statutorily-mandated written findings. The Department of Human Services (DHS) responds that, at the permanency hearing, father failed to object to the lack...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.