PER CURIAM.
Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of contempt based on his violation of a restraining order. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred by entering three separate convictions when, in fact, each of the counts was based on a single course of conduct that violated three separate provisions of a restraining order.
The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in that respect. See State v. Mason,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.