PFIZER INC. v. OREGON DEPT. OF JUSTICE

08C25784; A144063.

294 P.3d 496 (2012)

254 Or. App. 144

PFIZER INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, acting by and through its Attorney General, John KROGER, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 19, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam B. Siegel , New York, argued the cause for appellant. On the opening brief were James E. Mountain, Jr. , Jona J. Maukonen , and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick PC, and Michael J. Sandmire , Lori Irish Bauman , and Ater Wynne LLP. On the reply brief were Michael J. Sandmire , Lori Irish Bauman , and Ater Wynne LLP.

Stephanie L. Striffler , Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams , Solicitor General.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


HASELTON, C.J.

Plaintiff Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer1) appeals a general judgment, declaring that over 100 exhibits that Pfizer had produced during the course of an investigation by defendant Oregon Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning Pfizer's marketing of the medications Bextra and Celebrex, as well as an annotated complaint predicated on those exhibits, are not exempt from disclosure under the parties' confidentiality agreements. On appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases