HADLOCK, J.
Respondent appeals the trial court's entry of a stalking protective order (SPO), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the order. We do not view this as the sort of "exceptional case" in which de novo review would be appropriate. Accordingly, we review the trial court's factual findings for "any evidence" and its legal conclusions for errors of law. See Travis v. Strubel,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.